Freshwater
Spring Introduction
Freshwater Springs
as Model Systems
Further
Background |
|
FRESHWATER SPRINGS AS MODEL SYSTEMS
Springs are formed where underground water surfaces through rock faults
or fractures to form a brook (rheocrene), pond (limnocrene), or marsh (helocrene).
Springs are unique freshwater habitats because their physical and chemical
environments are usually nearly constant. Persistent springs never
freeze over, and large ones maintain remarkably constant temperatures throughout
the year. These and other advantageous properties make springs excellent
natural laboratories for studying the ecology and evolution of species
and biotic communities (Glazier, 1998; Williams and Williams, 1998), as
attested by the following quotations from two leading biologists:
“Springs are the aquatic ecologist’s natural constant
temperature laboratory. Because of the relative constancy of the
chemical composition, velocity of water, and temperature, in comparison
with lakes, rivers, marine environments, and terrestrial communities, springs
hold a position of importance as study areas that is out of proportion
to their size and number.” (E.P. Odum, 1971)
“It would seem … that springs may offer almost ideal
sites for evolutionary genetic studies, especially in glaciated areas where
their ages can be fairly accurately known.” (H.B.N. Hynes, 1970)
A limnocrene: Bouquet Spring, McConnellstown, PA
Specific advantages of springs include:
-
The constant temperature of springs allows field work to be carried out
year-round, despite marked seasonal changes in the “outside world”.
-
The remarkably constant temperatures and water chemistry of springs simplify
the interpretation of field research and the establishment of field conditions
in the laboratory.
-
Springs may differ significantly in habitat (e.g., substrate, amount of
aquatic vegetation, and degree of shading by springside vegetation), water
chemistry (e.g., pH and ionic content), and biotic composition (e.g., presence
or absence of specific competitors, predators and/or parasites), thus constituting
useful “natural experiments”.
Cold Spring
(an acidic, soft water spring)
|
Griffith Spring
(a watercress-choked spring)
|
Huntingdon, PA
-
Springs are typically small, discrete habitats, usually with relatively
few common species, thus simplifying population, community and ecosystem
analyses.
-
Many springs have clear, shallow, slow-moving water, thus facilitating
collection of organisms, behavioral studies, and transplant and enclosure
experiments and their observation.
View of clear, shallow water in Warm Spring,
Huntingdon, PA
-
Environmental gradients along the length of springbrooks are useful for
investigating the effects of environmental variation (e.g., temperature)
on living systems.
-
Springs are directly connected to groundwater and/or cave environments,
and thus are useful for monitoring the quality of groundwater, and for
comparing the adaptations of surface and subterranean life.
-
Large springs may have a mosaic of habitats suitable for studies of habitat
selection (e.g., Gooch and Glazier, 1991). Microhabitat stability
is made possible by nearly constant flow rates. As can be seen in
the photographs below, a summer rainstorm causes great increases in the
water and sediment flow of run-off streams, whereas the flow rate and water
clarity of spring-fed streams are little affected.
Crooked Creek (A) |
|
Bouquet Springbrook (B) |
Views of a run-off stream (A) and spring-fed stream (B) one hour after
a summer rainstorm (July 19, 1996). The streams are located on opposite
sides of Route 26 running through McConnellstown, PA.
Because of these advantageous properties, several noteworthy ecological
studies have been carried out in springs. For example,
springs have been used as model ecosystems to study productivity, energy
flow and trophic relationships (e.g., Odum, 1957; Teal, 1957; Minckley,
1963; Minshall, 1967; Tilly, 1968; Iversen, 1988). Nevertheless,
springs remain relatively neglected as subjects of ecological and evolutionary
study. Little comparative work has been done on North American springs
(e.g., Glazier & Gooch, 1987; Webb et al., 1995; Williams, Williams
& Cao, 1997; Erman, 1998); and little is known about why the biotas
of springs are often markedly different from those of downstream sites
and of run-off supplied headwater streams (Glazier, 1991).
Springs and their inhabitants also appear to have been little used as
tools to teach students basic ecological and evolutionary ideas and methodologies,
despite their being well-suited for this purpose. It is hoped that
this web page will help to stimulate others to use springs as both educational
and research systems.
next
page |